Esther 8:8
Write ye also for the Jews, as it liketh you, in the king’s name, and seal it with the king’s ring: for the writing which is written in the king’s name, and sealed with the king’s ring, may no man reverse.
Cross-references
Esther 8:5 shows Esther requesting permission to write a counter-edict; the king here grants that request, fulfilling her plea.
Esther 1:19 establishes the irrevocable Persian law—same principle invoked here that a sealed edict cannot be revoked.
Esther 3:12 describes Haman's edict written in the king's name and sealed—identical procedure now used for the counter-edict.
Esther 3:10 shows the king giving his signet ring to Haman to seal the first decree — the same ring and authority now given to Mordecai.
Daniel 6:8 describes the Medo-Persian law that cannot be changed—same legal system referenced in Esther here.
Daniel 6:12-15 shows the irrevocable decree applied against Daniel—parallel to the irrevocability of Haman's edict countered here.
In Genesis 41:42, Pharaoh gives Joseph his signet ring to authorize decrees — same act of transferring royal authority via a ring.
Daniel 6:15 states the Medo-Persian law that no royal ordinance can be changed — identical principle to the irreversible decree here.