Esther 1:19
If it please the king, let there go a royal commandment from him, and let it be written among the laws of the Persians and the Medes, that it be not altered, That Vashti come no more before king Ahasuerus; and let the king give her royal estate unto another that is better than she.
Cross-reference
Esther 1:21 records the king's acceptance of Memucan's advice—directly fulfilling the proposal in v. 19.
Esther 3:9 uses the same courtly formula 'If it pleases the king'—Haman's destructive request echoes Memucan's proposal.
In Esther 8:5, Esther appeals to revoke Haman's decree, highlighting the same irrevocable Persian law system introduced here.
In Esther 8:8, the king explicitly states that Persian decrees sealed with the signet cannot be revoked, directly echoing the legal principle here.
In Esther 4:11, the law of approaching the king uninvited shows the absolute royal power, similar to the irrevocable decree concept here.
In 1 Samuel 15:28, God removes Saul's kingdom and gives it to a better neighbor, paralleling Vashti's removal for a better queen here.
In Daniel 6:8-15, the same irrevocable law tradition appears as enemies trap Darius with a decree that cannot be changed.
In Daniel 6:17, the sealing of the lion's den with the king's signet prevents reversal, similar to the irrevocable decree concept here.
In Daniel 6:12, the enemies confront Darius about the unchangeable decree he signed, directly parallel to the irrevocable law here.