Exodus 22:4 also demands double restitution for stolen property found with the thief, mirroring the double payment principle here.

Exodus 22:7 similarly requires double restitution when property entrusted for safekeeping is stolen, a parallel case of double payment.

Exodus 18:21 gives qualifications for judges who would hear cases like the one described here.

Exodus 18:22 explains that smaller disputes like this are judged by appointed judges, not Moses.

Exodus 23:6-8 warns against bribery and partiality, protecting the judicial process this verse establishes.

Deuteronomy 16:18 repeats the command to appoint judges for just judgment, supporting the legal framework here.

Deuteronomy 16:19 echoes the prohibition of bribery and partiality, ensuring fair judgment for such cases.

Deuteronomy 25:1 describes the same process of bringing a controversy before judges for verdict, directly parallel.

In 2 Chronicles 19:10, Jehoshaphat instructs judges to handle legal disputes, paralleling the judicial process for property cases here.

Leviticus 6:3 addresses the same scenario of finding lost property and lying about it, adding the element of false oath.

Numbers 5:7 requires restitution with an added fifth, while Exodus 22:9 prescribes double — both laws on restitution for trespass.

First Kings 8:31 references oaths in trespass cases before the altar, echoing the judicial process of Exodus 22:9 where both parties come before judges.

Matthew 18:15 instructs private confrontation for personal sin, paralleling the principle of resolving disputes before escalation to judges.