Matthew 20:13

But he answered one of them, and said, Friend, I do thee no wrong: didst not thou agree with me for a penny?

Cross-references

Matthew 20:2 Historical context

Matthew 20:2 records the agreed wage — shows the worker had a contract, reinforcing the landowner's point.

In Matthew 22:12, the king uses the same address 'friend' (hetaire) to rebuke a guest — identical wording in a master's rebuke.

In Matthew 26:50, Jesus addresses Judas as 'friend' (hetaire) at betrayal — same distinctive term used in a rebuke, reinforcing the pattern.

Job 34:8 Contrast

Job 34:11 states God repays according to work — directly opposing the parable's equal pay for unequal work, highlighting grace vs merit.

Job 40:8 Related theme

Job 40:8 directly challenges discrediting God's justice — parallels the worker's complaint.

Romans 9:14 Parallel

Romans 9:14 asks 'Is God unjust?' — the same issue the landowner addresses in the parable.

Romans 9:15 Parallel

Romans 9:15 cites God's sovereign mercy — parallels the landowner's right to choose generosity.

Luke 15:31 Parallel

Luke 15:31 shows a father's gracious response to a complaining son — parallels the landowner's reply.

Genesis 18:25 argues God should not treat righteous and wicked alike — contrasting with the parable where all workers receive equal pay, raising questions of justice.

Job 34:17 Related theme

Job 34:17 asks whether one can condemn the just God — supporting the landowner's claim that he is not unfair, rebuking the worker's complaint.

Job 35:2 Related theme

Job 35:2 echoes the same questioning of God's justice — 'Do you think this is just?'