John 9:16
Therefore said some of the Pharisees, This man is not of God, because he keepeth not the sabbath day. Others said, How can a man that is a sinner do such miracles? And there was a division among them.
Cross-reference
In John 9:24, the Pharisees reiterate 'we know this man is a sinner'—reinforcing their judgment from v16.
John 9:30-33 presents the healed man's argument that the miracle proves Jesus is from God—directly opposing the Pharisees' claim.
In John 9:29, the Pharisees further argue they know Moses but not Jesus — deepening their doubt seen here.
In John 9:33, the healed man insists Jesus is from God — directly opposing the Pharisees' accusation here.
In John 7:12, the crowd is also divided over Jesus — some call Him good, others a deceiver — mirroring the Pharisees' split in John 9:16.
In John 7:43, division arises among the people over Jesus — the same Greek word 'schisma' used for the Pharisees' split in John 9:16.
In John 10:19, division again among the Jews over Jesus' words — continuing the pattern of schism seen in John 9:16.
In John 14:11, Jesus appeals to His works as proof of His unity with the Father — answering the Pharisees' doubt about His signs in John 9:16.
In John 15:24, Jesus says His unique works leave no excuse for unbelief — the Pharisees in John 9:16 saw the sign yet remained divided.
John 5:11 gives the healed man's reply at Bethesda — another Sabbath healing dispute highlighting the same issue.
John 3:2 records Nicodemus' statement that signs prove God is with Jesus—the same logic some Pharisees reject here.
In Matthew 12:10, Pharisees ask if healing on Sabbath is lawful to accuse Jesus — the same issue that divides them in John 9:16.
In Mark 2:28, Jesus declares Himself Lord of the Sabbath — directly countering the Pharisees' criticism of His Sabbath healing in John 9:16.
Luke 6:7 shows Pharisees watching to accuse Jesus — the same hostile scrutiny that underlies the division here.