Galatians 2:1 introduces Titus as Paul's companion on the Jerusalem visit, setting up the circumcision issue in 2:3.

Galatians 2:14 applies the same principle — Paul confronts Peter for compelling Gentiles to live like Jews, echoing Titus' freedom.

Galatians 5:2-6 makes the theological case that circumcision nullifies grace, explaining why Titus was not compelled.

Galatians 5:11 refutes the charge that Paul preaches circumcision — contrary to the false claim, as shown by Titus not being compelled.

Galatians 6:12 exposes the motives of those who compel circumcision — the very pressure Titus resisted.

Acts 15:24 shows the Jerusalem apostles disavowing the circumcision requirement, confirming Paul's account.

Acts 16:3 records Paul circumcising Timothy for expediency, contrasting with his refusal to compel Titus.

1 Corinthians 9:20 explains Paul's principle of becoming a Jew to win Jews — the reason for flexible circumcision policy.

1 Corinthians 9:21 shows Paul's freedom to live as a Gentile among Gentiles — basis for not requiring circumcision.

Acts 15:1 records the demand for circumcision that Paul opposed — the very pressure Titus was not compelled to yield to.

In Titus 1:4, Paul calls Titus his true son in the faith—same individual mentioned as uncircumcised Greek here.