Exodus 10:8 records Pharaoh's earlier bargaining — here in 10:24 he again tries to compromise, now allowing children but keeping livestock.

In Exodus 10:9, Moses demanded livestock also go for the feast; Pharaoh here allows little ones but refuses livestock, directly opposing that demand.

In Exodus 10:10, Pharaoh refused to let even the little ones go; here he relents that point but retains livestock — a partial shift from total refusal.

In Exodus 3:18, God's initial demand required a three-day journey to sacrifice; Pharaoh's condition in 10:24 to keep livestock prevents fulfilling that sacrifice.

In Exodus 9:28, Pharaoh promised to let them go completely; now in 10:24 he imposes a new condition, breaking that promise.

In Exodus 8:8, Pharaoh promised unconditionally to let the people go sacrifice; here he attaches a condition, showing his pattern of reneging.

In Exodus 8:28, Pharaoh earlier offered to let them go with only a distance restriction; here he similarly tries to limit worship, this time by keeping livestock.