Acts 26:26 has Paul appealing to Agrippa's knowledge of these events—both verses acknowledge Agrippa's expertise and familiarity.

Acts 24:10 parallels this: Paul acknowledges Felix's long tenure as judge, just as he flatters Agrippa's expertise in Jewish matters.

Acts 25:19 gives Festus' account of the Jewish disputes over Jesus — precisely the 'controversies' Paul says Agrippa knows well.

Acts 28:17 shows Paul insisting he did nothing against Jewish customs — reinforcing the centrality of these customs in his defense.

Acts 6:14 records Stephen's accusers claiming he spoke against Jewish customs — the same controversies Paul says Agrippa is expert in.

Acts 21:21 shows Paul accused of teaching Jews to forsake Moses and customs — matching the 'customs and controversies' Paul references here.

Acts 25:20 shows Festus perplexed by these Jewish controversies — highlighting why Agrippa's expertise matters in Paul's defense.

Acts 25:26 explains why Festus brought Paul to Agrippa — setting the stage for Paul's appeal to Agrippa's knowledge of Jewish customs.

Acts 18:15 shows Gallio dismissing disputes about Jewish law — the same kind of controversies Paul notes Agrippa is expert in.

Acts 24:22 mentions Felix's accurate knowledge of the Way — parallel to Agrippa's expertise in Jewish customs.