Acts 22:25

And as they bound him with thongs, Paul said unto the centurion that stood by, Is it lawful for you to scourge a man that is a Roman, and uncondemned?

Cross-reference

Acts 22:27 Parallel

Acts 22:27 records the tribune's direct response to Paul's citizenship claim — the immediate follow-up to his protest.

Acts 22:28 Parallel

Acts 22:28 continues the exchange as the tribune reveals he bought his citizenship, while Paul was born a citizen — deepening the citizenship theme.

Acts 22:24 Parallel

Acts 22:24 is the order to examine Paul by scourging. Acts 22:25 is Paul's immediate response. Direct cause and effect.

Acts 22:29 Parallel

Acts 22:29 records the soldiers' reaction after learning Paul is a Roman citizen. Immediate consequence of his claim.

Acts 16:37 Parallel

Acts 16:37 shows Paul using the same citizenship argument in Philippi — also protesting illegal flogging — reinforcing his consistent stance.

Acts 23:27 Parallel

In Acts 23:27, the commander's letter recounts the same event: he rescued Paul after learning he was a Roman citizen.

Acts 25:16 Historical context

Acts 25:16 articulates Roman legal principle of not condemning uncondemned. Both affirm due process; Paul invokes that principle.

Acts 27:3 Contrast

Acts 27:3 shows Julius treating Paul kindly — a direct contrast to the centurion here who was binding him for flogging.

Acts 27:43 Contrast

Acts 27:43 has Julius saving Paul, contrasting the centurion here who was complicit in illegal flogging.