In 1 Kings 14:30, this ongoing war between Rehoboam and Jeroboam is one of the acts referred to by the formula in the main verse.

In 1 Kings 14:29, the same concluding formula is used for Rehoboam, mirroring the structure of the main verse for Jeroboam.

In 1 Kings 15:31, the same formulaic conclusion is applied to Nadab, continuing the pattern from the main verse.

In 1 Kings 16:5, the same formula is used for Baasha, echoing the main verse's reference to the chronicles.

In 1 Kings 16:14, the same formulaic ending appears for Elah, following the pattern set in the main verse.

In 1 Kings 16:20, the same formula is used for Zimri, including mention of treason, paralleling the main verse's structure.

In 1 Kings 16:27, the same formula concludes Omri's account, mirroring the main verse's reference to the chronicles.

In 1 Kings 22:39, the same formula appears for Ahab, with added details about his works, continuing the pattern from the main verse.

In 2 Chronicles 13:2-20, this detailed account of Jeroboam's war with Abijah is among the acts mentioned in the formula of the main verse.

In 2 Kings 1:18, the same formulaic phrase concludes Ahaziah's account, showing the consistent editorial pattern in Kings.

2 Kings 20:20 applies the formula to Hezekiah (Judah), showing the pattern continues in the southern kingdom.

2 Kings 15:15 concludes Shallum's brief reign with the same formula, confirming its use for even short-lived kings.

2 Kings 14:15 uses this formula for Jehoash, maintaining the uniform structure of regnal summaries in Kings.

2 Kings 13:8 applies the same closing phrase to Jehoahaz, continuing the consistent formula for Israelite kings.

2 Kings 12:19 mirrors this formula for Joash (Judah), demonstrating the same editorial pattern across both kingdoms.

2 Kings 10:34 uses the identical closing formula for Jehu, reinforcing the standardized way each king's reign is summarized.

2 Chronicles 33:18 uses a similar closing formula for Manasseh, linking the chronicler’s source references to Kings.